When – The Jab – becomes The Sucker Punch
Steven Poole is a British
journalist who has authored books on the abuse of language. His column – Steven
Poole’s word of the week – is featured in The Guardian. In February, one of
Poole’s headlines asked: Why do we call vaccinations ‘jabs’?
Poole explained, since
the 16th century the verb jab first described the pecking of birds, then it was
used to describe any poking or thrusting action. Later the term was
incorporated into boxing. A jab was a straight punch from the fighter’s
non-dominant hand. The origin of the medical use of the term comes from a 1914
dictionary of criminal slang. A jab was a hypodermic injection amongst morphine
and cocaine fiends.
Poole provides the public
with lessons in etymology. Etymology is the study of the origin of words and
the way in which their meanings developed or changed throughout history.
Recently, a Miami Herald
headline asked: Why did the CDC change its definition of ‘vaccine’? Apparently,
the Center for Disease Control and Prevention modified its definitions of the
words “vaccine” and “vaccination” on its website.
The Miami Herald stated,
“Before the change, the definition for ‘vaccination’ read, ‘the act of
introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.’
Now, the word immunity has been switched to protection.
Immunity and protection
are synonyms, but the words do have different definitions, so the terms aren’t
automatically interchangeable. The Oxford Dictionary defines protection as the
action of protecting or the state of being protected, but immunity has two
definitions. First, it means the ability of an organism to resist a particular
infection or toxin by the action of specific antibodies or sensitized white
blood cells. Second, it means protection or exemption from something,
especially an obligation or penalty.
Obviously, the first
definition is medical and the second definition is legal.
The CDC also altered the
term vaccine. The CDC’s definition changed from ‘a product that stimulates a
person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease’ to ‘a
preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against
diseases.”
Of course, skeptics and
conspiracy theorists suggested that the CDC’s unannounced changes were an
attempt to disguise the fact COVID-19 vaccines are not 100 percent effective at
preventing coronavirus infections.
A spokesperson for the
CDC denied any malfeasance, then gave an explanation followed by an
endorsement. The spokesperson explained, the previous definition could have
been interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100 percent effective, which has
never been the case for any vaccine, so the current definition is more
transparent, then the spokesperson said, “It’s important to note that the
modifications to the definition of ‘vaccine’ don’t change the fact that vaccines
and vaccinations has prevented millions of illnesses and saved countless
lives.”
In a tongue in cheek
tweet, U.S. Representative Thomas Massie said, "The CDC has been busy at
the Ministry of Truth."
The Ministry of Truth is
a reference to George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984. The main character was
employed at the Ministry of Truth, and his job was to rewrite history and
falsify records, so they corresponded with the government’s current claims and
agenda. The Ministry of Truth believed – people could not think without words –
so they redefined words in the dictionary in order to make people think how the
definition instructed them to think, rendering it impossible to think
independently.
Orwell gave an example of
this manipulation with the word free. After the Ministry of Truth redefined
free, the word could only be used in a statement like “the field is free from
weeds”, but the word could not be used in the sense of “politically free” or
“intellectually free” because political and intellectual freedom no longer
existed as concepts.
The CDC spokesperson
claimed that “slight changes in wording” haven't impacted the overall
definition of vaccine, but a lot of people believe the definition has been
corrupted in an Orwellian fashion, and they don’t want to get vaccinated
because they don’t know whether they’re getting jabbed or sucker punched.
First published in New
Pittsburgh Courier 10/8/21
Comments
Post a Comment