The war on masculinity (op-ed)
A British journalist
described a childhood game played on the beach.
After an ocean liner departed the harbor children tried to time when the
massive wave produced by the ship would crash ashore. Sometime the wave took so long the children
forgot about it, but when it finally arrived those not paying attention were swept
away without warning.
In 2000 philosopher Christina Hoff Sommers published a
book called: The War Against Boys, How Misguided Feminism is Harming our Young
Men. Sommers claimed, for decades
women’s groups have insisted that there was a “girl crisis” because boys
benefited from a school system that favored them and was biased against girls. According to these women groups, the “girl
crisis” was compounded because boys were given to school yard violence and
sexual harassment.
Sommers wrote, “Boys are resented, both as the unfairly
privileged sex and as obstacles on the path to gender justice for girls … The
idea that schools and society grinds girls down has given rise to an array of
laws and policies intended to curtail the advantage boys have and to redress
the harm to girls.”
But Sommers pointed out the conventional wisdom of the
“girl crisis” wasn’t true.
The data revealed, girls received better grades, had
higher educational aspirations, followed more rigorous academic programs,
participated more in advance placement classes, and were slightly more enrolled
in high level math and science courses.
Girls outnumbered boys in student government, in honor societies, school
newspapers, and debating teams. Girls
read more books and outperformed boys on test for artistic and musical
ability.
At the same time, boys were suspended from school more than girls, more boys were held back, more boys dropped out, boys were three times as likely to receive a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, more boys were involved in crime, alcohol, and drugs.
The data revealed girls attempted suicide more often than
boys, but it was boys who more often succeeded.
In 1997, a typical year, 4,483 young people aged five to twenty-four
committed suicide, 701 were females and 3,782 were males.
What was more troubling than the negative data concerning
boys was that it was dismissed or completely ignored. Now, here’s two facts that can’t be ignored. First, every boy born in 2000 is now a young
man, and they have graduated from the “girl crisis” to the #MeToo era. Second, the ideas that carry the day in our
institutions of higher learning eventually trickle down into the popular
culture. These ideas (some good, some
bad) surface in movies, music, and TV commercials.
Recently, Gillette, the razor company, aired an ad that
received a lot of backlash. The
commercial condemned bullying, sexual harassment, and toxic masculinity. The commercial is noncontroversial until you
realize bullying and sexual harassment are not gender specific, but they were
highlighted as examples of the ad’s central concern – toxic masculinity.
But what exactly is meant by that term?
CBS This Morning had a panel discussion about the commercial. The segment was introduced with this caption:
Gillette ad raises questions about what being a man means, and a psychologist
was asked: What does the science tell us about notions of masculinity? (You see
how the topic changed from toxic masculinity to masculinity in general.) The psychologist said: Being a man in this
culture comes with an extra measure of power … And men can either use that
power to be violent or sexist or they can use that power to stick up for people
that have less power and be positive leaders. (These are the only options? Is this really what the science tells
us?) Then a chart appeared on the screen
that listed five extremes of masculinity that are bad for mental and physical
health.
The toxic five were: Powerful, fearless, strong, emotionless, successful.
Those who say the Gillette ad was just a commercial aren’t paying attention. The 2000 war on boys just shifted to the war on masculinity and in 2019 the wave finally hit the beach.
First published in the
New Pittsburgh Courier 1/23/19
Comments
Post a Comment