MLK: Where do we go from here?
Martin
Luther King Jr.’s holiday just passed. During this time we
celebrate “The King years”. Of course we’re proud when we hear
the “I have a dream” speech and teary-eyed when King announces
“he’s been to the mountain top”, but there’s one speech in
between those two that’s just as intriguing.
The
term “The King Years” is actually the subtitle of historian
Taylor Branch’s trilogy on the civil rights movement. King’s
career, as a civil rights leader, began in 1955 during the Montgomery
Bus Boycott when he was president of the Montgomery Improvement
Association.
But
what’s significant about the date 1955?
It
was one year after the Supreme Court declared segregation in public
schools unconstitutional in Brown v Board of Education. Now,
King was born in 1929 in segregated Georgia. As a child King hoped
for desegregation, but thought it would never occur in his lifetime.
King’s generation grew up during the depression and World War II.
They sensed America was too preoccupied with world affairs to be
concerned with its own democratic inconsistencies.
But
history finally favored them in the 1954 Brown decision.
Today,
we view King as a larger than life figure that transformed society,
but we overlook the fact that King, who was 25 in 1954, and his
generation was transformed by the landmark historical event of their
time, because the Brown decision was a parting of the waters. (The
title of Branch’s first book)
Unlike
their predecessors, King’s generation had a precedent established
by the Supreme Court to desegregate and dismantle all other forms of
discrimination. This eventually led to the historic March on
Washington, where King delivered his famous Dream speech, and to the
passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Bill and the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
In
a turbulent decade King’s generation completed the task started by
the Brown Decision. But their celebration was brief. They realized
that civil rights legislation, as difficult as it was to get passed,
was actually the easy part. America wasn’t going to change
overnight.
At
this point a growing impatience among the rank and file led to
dissension. There was a rejection of non-violence, a new demand for
“black power”, and riots broke out in the cities. And to make
matters worse, the White House promised a war on poverty, but the
only war waged by the White house was in Vietnam.
The
King generation reached a mid-movement crisis. They had to redefine
their purpose. This is when King’s youth caught up to him.
Internally King probably grappled with the question: What do we do
now? And once King worked it out in his mind, he gave a speech in
1967 called: Where do we go from here?
King
began by citing statistics to show the state of black America in
1967. The disparities King emphasized are similar to the disparities
black activist denounce today. King’s prescription for poverty was
a guaranteed annual income. (Now-a-days it’s referred to as
universal basic income. It has support on the left and right.) Then
King spoke about psychological freedom. King made it clear black
Americans had to be able to admit, “Yes, I was a slave through my
fore parents and I am not ashamed of that.” Then King discussed
power. King said blacks have been “stripped of the right to make
decisions concerning their lives and destiny … subject to the
authoritarian rule and sometimes whimsical decisions of the white
power structure … Now power properly understood is nothing but the
ability to achieve purpose.”
But
what if the biggest problem today is a poverty of purpose?
Now,
repeat King’s last question: Where do we go from here?
First
published in the New Pittsburgh Courier 1/17/18
Hello Mr Doss,
ReplyDeleteI have also used the Brown v. Board decision in a couple short essays but as a trilogy pointing out that, "The law is what the judge says it is."
The first two parts of this trilogy are:
1. Dred Scott Decision (1857): A slave was not a citizen.
2. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896): Separate but equal was constitutional.