President-elect Biden’s “unrelenting” commitment to diversity? (op-ed)
President-elect Joe Biden
told the American people, “My administration’s going to look like America, not
just my staff, the administration from the vice president straight down through
cabinet members to major players within the White House and the courts.”
That sounds good, but
what’s accomplished by having an administration that looks like America?
The President-elect’s
statement reinforced a previous pledge – to have an unrelenting commitment to
diversity. Diversity is multifaceted,
but Biden was referring to Title VII diversity.
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibited discrimination based
on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. (Today the diversity
doctrine includes other groups.)
However, prohibiting discrimination was the easy part. Integrating, or including the formerly
excluded, without government fiat was the difficulty.
Diversity became the
doctrine for voluntary inclusion.
For the last three
decades of the 20th century experts have described to American
institutions the benefits of diversity and American institutions have been
diversifying rapidly. By the 21st
century American institutions were competing and giving out awards for
ingenuity and leadership in diversity.
Both Bush and Obama’s presidential administrations were respectively
considered the most diverse in American history.
That’s why Biden’s
“unrelenting” commitment to diversity sounds overdramatic.
However, Biden also
pledged his administration would finally “root out systemic racism” in the
Unites States. According to the
diversity doctrine, systemic racism exists because political administrations
and corporate boardrooms didn’t look like America, and diversifying the
positions of power was a preemptive strike against the racism that prevailed
post-Jim Crow. Experts theorized diverse
administrations and boardrooms would detect and eliminate the unconscious bias
that materialized into systemic racism.
However, during Biden’s
second vice-presidential term, a riot erupted in Baltimore after a black man,
Freddie Gray, died in police custody.
Two news headlines summarized the consensus.
--Baltimore exposes
America’s systemic racism, poverty, and inequality
--Baltimore riots: Locals
say, unrest is response to systemic racism
According to the
diversity doctrine the second headline makes no sense. By the time of Gray’s death Baltimore was on
its 4th black mayor, two men, two women, and three were also
Baltimore city council presidents.
During the time of Gray’s death Baltimore’s police chief was black. Baltimore’s police force had 2,745
active-duty police officers and 1,445 – more than half – were black, Hispanic,
Asian, or Native American, plus 4 of their top 6 commanders were black or
Hispanic.
Of the six officers
charged with Gray’s death three were black, two men and one woman. The judge that presided over the trial of the
officers was a black man and the state prosecutor was a black woman, plus there
were 5 black women and 3 black men on the jury.
The people in charge of
Baltimore looked like the people of Baltimore.
Yet the not guilty verdict for the officers involved in Gray’s death
was, and still is, cited as an example of systemic racism. It’s never considered a fair and impartial
proceeding conducted by a diverse system.
Why not?
One news headline
answered: Black cops, Black mayors, didn’t save Baltimore from police abuse –
The limits of diversity. But the
“experts” in systemic racism went further and theorized any system that disproportionately
produced negative outcomes for minorities was racist by result, regardless of
the racial make-up of its administrators.
These “experts” not only
rendered the diversity doctrine antiquated they also claimed diversity had no
practical utility in the first place.
Therefore, Biden’s
“unrelenting commitment” to create an administration that looks like America,
in an effort to finally root out systemic racism, proves an ancient political
adage: You can’t teach an old senator new tricks.
First published in the New Pittsburgh Courier 12/16/2020
Comments
Post a Comment